Sign in

Courtesy navigation

Blog posts in Internet marketing

Displaying 1 to 6 of 154 results

QR codes - a bit of a let-down

January 09, 2012 by Dan Parker

QR code cow{{}}I’ll be honest — I love advertising! Being magically sucked into the brand or experience as a consumer can be an extraordinary journey, sometimes painful, quite often exceptional. Maybe I’m a strange workaholic but to see how other companies engage with consumers is a fantastic and creative education we can all learn from.

I see adverts promoting brands, some encouraging social conversation, whilst others collect customer leads in return for voucher codes or even a test drive for your new Ford Focus.

However, this year I’ve spent most of it cringing at a particular advertising “shambles” — QR Codes (Quick Response codes) or barcodes as they are so often confused with.

Being a gadget fiend, I thought this would be brilliant, a quick scan from the phone in my pocket and I’m into a new world surrounded by captivating content from my favorite companies. But I’m consistently let down, time and time again.

It’s the daft use of such codes that has been, I’m afraid to say, a real embarrassment for advertising — even worse when used as the sole call-to-action. Most of the time, I’m directed to a non-mobile optimised site, which leaves me lost on an unrelated page and walking away with less information than I started with. My latest copy of Marketing Week, which once had QR codes throughout, now only has one on an advert for a “Marketing College”, and it doesn’t even work!

And what consumer data is being captured? None. At least with a link to a Facebook page or even a SMS auto-reply (I’m biased, but hey, it works!), the advert will offer more for you and your customers. More importantly, your customers understand this effective technology.

Unfortunately, the abundance of common QR mistakes is one education we could do with forgetting. On top of that, a recent survey by Simpson Carpenter shows that only 34 per cent of your customers know what a QR code is used for. And of those that do, only 11 per cent have scanned one. Are you really happy neglecting two-thirds of your potential customer base?

How about the QR code added to the end of the Waitrose TV advert last year? For those that spotted it, they had about two seconds to grab the mobile phone from their pocket; download an app; wait for it to load and leap out of their chair to capture the code with the gracefulness of a catapulted “Angry Bird”. This year, they’ve ditched the QR code for a Blippar tag. “What?”, you ask. All I can say is...I hope you’ve got Sky+!

QR codes do have their place in your marketing activity and can really boost your business profile in many innovative ways to a very selected audience. John Lewis’ recent virtual shopping boards is one fantastic example. No doubt, in time, more and more consumers will get to grips with what they are. How many will actually use it though, is still up for debate.

For me, the process is just too clunky and slow. Perhaps they should be renamed NRTQR (Not Really That Quick Response) Codes.

Dan Parker is an expert contributor to Marketing Donut and the marketing director of online SMS marketing specialists FireText Communications.

For another take on QR codes, take a look at John McGarvey's blog on mobile apps on the IT Donut

To Google+, or Not To Google+

January 05, 2012 by Mark Bower

Wooden cube with plus{{}}With Google opening up its Plus social networking service to brands recently, the question we have been considering is whether it’s worth our time actively using the new brand pages.

Let me say before going any further though, you should definitely reserve a page in Google+ for your brand. It only takes a couple of minutes to register your page and you’ll ensure you won’t get hijacked by brand squatters.

Now, onto the question at hand — is it worth time and investment to create and maintain a fully functioning presence?

We can get an insight into the relative popularity of each service by looking at data from the Share buttons that proliferate across the web these days. We can use this as an indicator of the relative importance of each service.

For our study we looked took a sample of news and tech news websites: BBC, CNN, Guardian, New York Times, The Telegraph, Mashable and EConsultancy. Of those, only The Telegraph, Mashable and EConsultancy have added Google+ sharing to their site.

Next we took the top five stories from each site at the time we did the survey and looked at the number of shares on each service:

 

Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

Google+

Telegraph

 

 

 

 

 

968

577

54

16

 

60%

36%

3%

1%

Mashable

 

 

 

 

 

610

5211

1684

108

 

8%

68%

22%

1%

EConsultancy

 

 

 

 

 

43

311

39

22

 

10%

75%

9%

5%

Total

 

 

 

 

 

1613

6099

1777

146

 

17%

63%

18%

1.5%

So there you have it, according to our admittedly rather unscientific survey, Google+ represents less around 1.5% of sharing activity on sites that have a Google+ button, and a much smaller percentage of overall sharing activity given that most mainstream sites do not have a Google+ button.

On that basis we have decided not to spend time maintaining a Google+ page (yet).

Have you created a Google+ page? What results are you getting from it?

Mark Bower is co-founder of online social media management company CubeSocial.

How to stop your emails being deleted in the preview pane

January 04, 2012 by Sarah Orchard

Delete{{}}How’s this for a scary statistic? Eighty per cent of the emails you send to your potential customers will be viewed and actioned in the preview pane. That’s how hard email marketing has become – everyone struggles to get past the very first hurdle. And as more and more people move to smartphones, with images and preview panes standard issue, this statistic is set to increase.

So does that mean it’s time to throw in the towel? Is it really so impossible to avoid the dreaded delete button?

Don’t give up!

The good news is there are ways to get around this problem and it’s all about keeping the preview pane at the front of your mind when designing your emails.

A recent Lyris survey makes it very clear just how important it is to think carefully about your emails. The sender’s name and/or address is the key information readers look for in the preview pane (60 per cent), followed by the subject line (54.3 per cent), the main headline (53 per cent) and any teaser copy (30.3 per cent). 

So let’s take it from the top:

  • The “from” field needs to be a recognisable name and easy to distinguish amongst all the spam. People are becoming increasingly spam-savvy and can spot a dodgy email at ten paces from their computer (or phone!) screens, but a real name demands a closer look. This field remains a highly influential factor in the decision making process to delete or otherwise. And be aware that only 30 per cent of business users add new email addresses to their safe sender/address book so you cannot guarantee even if they wanted to receive your email that they can be bothered to ensure that it beats the spam filter every time. Think about how you behave on email – do you update your address book with the email addresses of those regular newsletters to which you have opted-in?
  • The “Subject” line needs to work as hard as possible for your business. Forget insipid email subject lines, such as “Re: your office needs” or “October Newsletter”. Think long and hard about the benefits you can offer to customers or the action you want them to take. It doesn’t have to be perfect prose, just make sure that subject line is front loaded with your key action-inducing messages.
  • The top of your email is prime marketing message space, so don’t waste it with empty words or admin like “view this email in a browser”. Use it for teaser text, intrigue your recipients to the point that they are compelled to read on and find out more about your business and what you could do for them. Or re-confirm what it is they are receiving to add that extra reassurance that the email is worth opening and moving beyond the delete button.

Keep it personal

Personalising emails can be really effective – I’ve had some great results using this approach. Try adding the recipient’s name into the subject line, eg “Sarah, here’s a great reason to buy X”.

Don’t forget it’s always well worth doing an A/B split test so that you can monitor and measure subject line (or even other parameters) performance. That way you’ll be able to assess whether a personalised subject line generates more responses than a generic version, and you can then apply the best strategy to your next mailing or if you use email marketing software like Mail Chimp, it sends the best performing subject line to the bulk of your email database. Clever stuff!

And while we’re on this subject, always make sure your email address data capture gets at least the first name so that you can use a Dear <first name> rather than Hello or Dear Customer/Member, which looks so unfriendly.

Obsessed with images?

Far too many of us spend too much time worrying about what our HTML email template will look like once it is received by our eager recipients. Unfortunately, with so many email clients reading your email, you simply cannot guarantee what it will look like ­– so stop obsessing!

Test as much as you can. Systems like Mail Chimp (provides Inbox Inspection) and other email marketing software allow you to test deliverability for spam. And make sure you send a copy to yourself and view in Outlook and perhaps a few others such as Hotmail and Yahoo mail (BT Internet is one of the most popular consumer ISP’s and uses Yahoo based web mail) – that should cover the basics as best you can.

That said, the majority of business users view their emails in Outlook, and it’s estimated that only 25 per cent of recipients have adjusted their Outlook settings to allow images to automatically download. And many companies have security blocks in terms of their firewall, so it’s best to avoid the inclusion of graphics or images if your emails contain important messages or calls to action. Try using text-based links and body copy for key messages. Avoid putting your action orientated or benefit-led headline into a fancy email header graphic as there is every possibility that it will never be seen and end up as a little white box with a red cross in it!

Don’t forget the acid test

If you’re unsure of the impact your email will have when it lands in someone’s inbox, try sending it to yourself or friends and family (not just for deliverability but for appeal too). Compare it to other emails you receive, particularly the junk that you delete without opening. Would the words in your subject line convince you? Does the slight glimpse of the email content itself look enticing enough?

There’s no point in pretending that email marketing can’t be challenging, but follow my advice and you’ll at least have a good fighting chance of getting through to your target audience.

Sarah Orchard is an expert contributor to Marketing Donut and a consultant at Orchard Marketing Associates.

For more information and advice, take a look in our dedicated section on email marketing.

How seriously should you consider the use of mobile for your business?

January 03, 2012 by Jeremy Thomson

Mobile with apps{{}}It has been the trend in digital marketing for the last million years that mobile will overtake laptop and desktop computers with more people using mobiles to access the web than desktops.

From the forecasted rise in increased use of mobile in comparison to desktops and the huge numbers of purchases being made via mobiles nowadays you can see why. The IAB are particularly fond of mobile, which is where they believe the future lies. And who can blame them; in a recent study they revealed that 51 per cent of the UK has undertaken and engaged in m-commerce with 42 per cent saying they use it because it is the easiest way to purchase.

Introducing Siri

The iPhone 4s came out recently and with it came Siri – your own personal assistant. With Siri you can ask it almost anything and it will pull the answers for you, from the local weather to a nice place to eat close to where you are. Its voice recognition software makes it the easiest to use — and that has now made using mobiles even easier.

What impact could this have on m-commerce? If the 42 per cent of people that are already using their mobile to purchase are doing it because of its ease of use, how much further will Siri help to increase this figure?

Does this then mean that all retailers should be active within mobile? Should you have a website that’s optimised for mobile or a mobile site? i.e should you have an optimised version of your pre-existing site or a site that is built solely for the purpose of use on a mobile, with unique content.

Having a mobile site could be the best avenue, particularly if you are a retailer. Crew Clothing are an example of a retailer that has identified this growth and they launched a mobile website this week to accurately target this market.

So, with mobile use forecasted to increase — in particular its use by consumers in purchasing and researching, is it something you should be considering?

Jeremy Thomson is a sales executive at at Minute Steak, the digital and search marketing agency aimed at SMEs.

The rise of social commerce

December 20, 2011 by Anton Gething

Keyboard speech bubbles{{}}Social commerce is something often discussed as a natural progression of two successful market arenas — social networking and e-commerce. But with the current forays into s-commerce amounting to little more than adding a Like button or setting up a Twitter feed, the evidence suggests that it’s not yet exceeding the sum of its parts.

The idea of social commerce, or s-commerce, is not necessarily a new one. Consumers have been shopping and having conversations for centuries but only recently have these trends become possible digitally, and only recently have retailers and brands begun to take notice. However, current attempts at using social media to generate loyalty and sales have not offered truly social experiences and have too often led to consumers being pushed onto external sites to interact. Shouldn’t retailers do more to keep their customers on their own websites?  

Giving customers a voice

The growth and popularity of social networking has shown that, when given the right tools, people like to, and do, interact with each other. However, most retailers are not implementing the tools that could see their brands becoming successfully social and engaging with their consumer base. For example, by making reviews and opinions an integral part of the online shopping experience, consumers could be as social online as they are in real life. That is, they could connect online with shoppers of similar tastes in order to influence and be influenced. Brands must put customers first and content second, and stop directing them to other social networks. If customers have a voice, brands must allow it to be heard. 

Keeping it private

Some brands worry about intruding on their customers’ privacy when trying to be more social. While it is important to allow customers to opt in or out, many are happy to share their views and help other consumers make purchasing decisions. Once opinions are shared in public, it is up to the brand to decide how to use them. If they can be harnessed to give the customer relevant and timely recommendations or information, the customer is more likely to have a positive experience. Brands can leave it up to the user to decide what they want to share and when, and information they choose to disclose can be used to provide a more useful social experience.

On-site engagement

Unfortunately, many businesses are still struggling when it comes to s-commerce, pushing customers to external sites like Facebook, rather than engaging consumers socially on their own site.  The result is that consumer interaction with the brand becomes diluted and the brand fails to generate customer loyalty. This could ultimately lead to retailers losing ground in the decision-making real estate that social commerce offers.

If done correctly however, s-commerce can be a profitable way to build brand trust and shopping confidence.  S-commerce provides the perfect opportunity for businesses to communicate directly with their customers, person to person, brand to fan.

Anton Gething is the co-founder and product director of nToklo.

Read more in our section on social media, which has everything from beginners’ guides to in-depth advice.

Brand pages launch on Google+

December 19, 2011 by Lucy Pullon

People in plus shape{{}}Last month, Google launched the first of the brand pages on Google+. Some of the early adopter brands to have pages include Cadburys, H&M, Pepsi and The New York Times to name but a few. And it’s not just big businesses that are building Google+ pages.

One of the key benefits to Google+ is that “circles” gives the user more control; they can decide how they share content and who they share it with. The brand pages will work in the same way facilitating a relationship between fans, advocates and potential customers.

Brands can decide how to interact with their fans. Users can be split into circles that target geographic locations, age groups, gender or a combination of all of these. This will allow for tailored messaging. However, the brand’s connectivity will be more limited than an individual’s page. An individual must add the brand page to a circle, and the brand cannot initiate the link and so this puts the user in control of the relationship.

The pages themselves will allow the brands to share content with certain groups, make content unsharable when necessary, post text, photos, videos and links, there can also be live video hangouts. Maps can be utilised for local businesses. Affiliated companies and people can be acknowledged on the page, and users can interact with them separately.

The impact of social media on SEO has become increasingly important in recent years and it’s apparent that content (be it a product, a status update or anything in between) with a +1 can appear considerably higher in the search results than those without.

Consequently, it is now more important than ever that brands become early adopters and have a useful, comprehensive Google+ page in line with their digital or social media strategy. Google+ won’t replace existing social media platforms — Twitter and Facebook are here to stay — but it’s a further platform to engage consumers and improve SERP visibility.

Lucy Ingram is a senior SEO account executive at Minute Steak, the digital and search marketing agency aimed at SMEs.

Displaying 1 to 6 of 154 results

Syndicate content