An interesting tweet relating to Hubspot’s findings that those with a Twitter avatar displaying a photo stand to gain ten times as many followers as those without, kicked off a healthy debate which prompted me— the Marketing Donut Twitterer — to question whether I should come out from behind the logo and show my face. If it wasn’t already conflicting enough to know whether ‘I’ am in fact a ‘We’ during commercial tweeting hours, this dilemma hits me. It was almost enough to induce a psychotic episode.
There are valid reasons for presenting the Marketing Donut as a face. It could produce tangible gains in number of Twitter followers and the quality and quantity of interactions. But when you communicate with @MarketingDonut - or any of the Donuts for that matter - you may not always be talking to the same person. Holiday leave, sickness and just being plain busy can often mean a personnel shuffle when it comes to Twitter. Without blowing the lid on the Twitter Magician’s code here at Donut Towers, we try to maintain the same team member on each Donut account for reasons of continuity and to give each Donut its own distinct personality. But, as the theatre waiver goes, the performance may be subject to last-minute cast changes.
On the whole, it is me - James Ainsworth - behind the tweets and if you were to DM the Marketing Donut, characters permitting, I would sign off as ‘James’. But I hope you enjoy following the Marketing Donut Twitter account for a plethora of reasons, not least for the content we share but for that little sparkle of personality that comes through every day.
The salient point from the discussion was made by @benparkatbjs, “Surely it depends. If a one-man band, tweeting with your own pic is fine, but if you're a donut, surely donut logo better?”
In a recent blog post written by Jan Minihane on the topic, she rightly points out that face value is better for individual accounts. But Jan also concludes from further discussion with her Twitter following that corporate accounts with multiple staff should “Use your logo as you are promoting the corporate brand, not an individual. (unless most of the brand value is you, in which case you may want to go with a picture of yourself).”
And what of the deliberate tactic deployed by @web_D, “I have used really small text and oversized logos to encourage people to click and see the full version”?
Should the Marketing Donut — as a publisher of resources for small businesses — be identifiable by the branding that has been created already or -as a mainly one man Twittering band - should I have my world-weary face as the avatar, bedecked with some kind of Marketing Donut insignia or, if you please, a Twibbon?
If you really want to see me on Twitter then you can follow me here but don’t expect such useful small business marketing advice. You have been warned!
Comments
The first thing to do, IMO, is to ditch any default avatar and get something unique up. That shows that you've taken ownership of the account at the very least and, IME, many spam accounts have the default avatar, so get it changed now.
As mentioned in the post I've used really small text and really large text to encourage users to click on the avatar and find out exactly what it says. This takes the user one step closer to following me as they'll be shown my latest tweets and/or account info.
Using a logo is also an excellent way of continuing your "branding". I wouldn't have a photo of me on my invoices, receipts or business cards; I use my company logo throughout in an attempt to improve recognition.
Having read this post I did think briefly about switching to a picture of me, but would never really know whether it was that change that was effecting my follower status.
An increase could be down to a particular blog post or article comment a decrease could be down to some Political related tweet I made or the fact I've been quiet for a few days.
I don't think it's necessary to get too bogged down in what we display as long as we display something and that something is relevant to you or your company.
@Maja_Black_Iris replayed to @MarketingDonut saying she preferred faces, yet she follows me, so I must be doing something right?
Hi All, I think when it is a business a logo is fine, afterall it could be more than one person who is responsible for maintaining the account. If a private account then yes I would say it should be a picture.
Cheers John
Phoenix24-7 24hr Telephone answering services
I think the answer is: do both.
tweet as yourself, making it clear you work for MD.
also tweet as MD, making it clear who's behind the account.
Retweet each others' tweets when appropriate.
This is scalable - lets you build up more members of the team all tweeting individually & through the MD account. Also lets you all RT each other when necessary, bringing more followers & engagement all round.
See econsultancy's accounts, or dogstrust, for examples of the ideas here.
dan
I think the Hubspot stats are slightly misleading here - they're really referring to having an image (whether it's a logo, a personal photo or whatever), or sticking with the default Twitter bird. It's no surprise that people who put an image on have more followers - they're probably making more effort. This is the point, really: to my mind it doesn't altogether matter what your image is (though I agree a face is better for a one-man band), it's the content of your tweets that counts. In corporate terms, it's important that your account identifies you corporately and that whoever looks after the Twitter account is personable, informative and, above all, professional. We can all think of examples where people blur the lines between their personal and professional lives rather too much. I can also think of examples where the corporate feed is faceless and impersonal. Personally, I think James gets it just right with the Marketing Donut Twitter account. But then I'm the site editor, so I'm biased...
Add a comment
Not registered? We'll create a new account for you when you add your comment