
While there have been many horror stories about how damaging negative publicity can spiral out control there is a school of thought that says any publicity is good publicity. The fact that your business is getting any media attention (albeit negative) is good as it raises you profile and is better than not being talked about.
I work for Empica PR and we have been involved in managing publicity for a controversial ad campaign by the heath and fitness club at Cadbury House. With so many people wanting to lose weight following the festive period theclub's marketing agency launched an integrated campaign in the first weeks of January to inspire people to join. It focused on an image of an alien with the tag line 'When the aliens come they will eat the fatties first' and was used across newspaper advertising, banners, leaflets and poster sites.
From a PR perspective we at Empica recognised this issue could be controversial though we could not predict exactly how it would unfold. We were keen to create discussion to increase exposure for the campaign. As it happened several people complained about the ad being offensive and discriminatory to over-weight people. The local press picked up on the complaints and carried our official statement from Cadbury House telling our side of the story and how it was meant in good humour – although with shock tactics aimed at those who had over-indulged at Christmas.
Often when a negative story appears the PR agency works hard to keep coverage to a minimum, in this case we positively encouraged it to snowball. It appeared in the Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail and on BBC radio. Now we had a story running we used online techniques to encourage debates about the pros and cons of the advert with bloggers. At this point we were being contacted by Sci-fi sites in the USA and gym manager Jason Eaton was even interviewed on Australian radio station, 4BC!
The ad campaign sparked one complaint to the Advertising Standards Authority – who dismissed it out of hand; most people joined the debate taking the advertisement as it was intended – as a piece of good natured humour. There were hundreds of comments online with people expressing there opinions. Our stance was it certainly was not meant to offend and the fact it features an Alien shows it was tongue-in-cheek.
As part of the overall strategy I also launched a social media strategy involving Twitter and Facebook to maximise publicity online. Part of this included a competition over Twitter where they gave away free memberships to the first 25 retweeters. The memberships went within the hour.
Social media gave this campaign a whole new dimension and certainly assisted the propagation of it worldwide. It provided another avenue for people to share their opinions about the issue and contribute to the discussion. Although certain aspects of the campaign were planned, we believe the real value of social media is to act fast and take advantage of opportunities.
This campaign is still growing and evolving. An initial seed was sown resulting in some negative publicity but the story continues to provide 'food for thought' as you can see from the video below.
Comments
Hi James,
I would definitely agree that a monitoring strategy is essential to understanding what conversation is occurring and what context it takes.
In the case of this campaign I monitored the communication that was already taking place online before setting up a social media strategy. As you say, having a viable presence on social media channels is essential to engage and respond quickly to negative PR.
Increasingly social media is also being used as a customer service channel where customers are able to give feedback whenever they wish. If this is not managed properly it can be disasterous for brands as customers increasingly form opinions about brands online.
Customers now also expect a two-way real-time conversation with the brand. This gives a level of engagement and interactivity that was never before possible.
Bad publicity which is not managed and occurs as a result of a lack of attention is very damaging as you rightly point out.
Avinash
Hi Avinash,
Whilst I agree that sometimes negative reactions can actually be really useful because you can spark conversations and engage with people, I do however think that bad publicity does exist when companies are not set-up to monitor back channels and respond effectively.
With social media it is easier than ever to share content and opinions and one person can influence globally. Take the United Airlines You Tube disaster as a great example - reports suggest poor customer service that went viral wiped 10% of share value.
Bad publicity can be incredibly damaging if your business does not monitor its reputation across all channels and actively participate in the back channel. If you don't respond to criticism and complaint, you are likely to experience significant brand damage.
So I guess whilst any publicity can be used to good effect, bad publicity often occurs because companies are not aware of the conversations taking place and therefore do nothing to influence them.
I personally loved your ads - I'm bored of people complaining and taking offence so easily, so anything that aggravates the complainers gets my seal of approval! And no, I'm not fatist.....
cheers
james
Add a comment
Not registered? We'll create a new account for you when you add your comment